Facebook Pixel


2024 Mast Cell Activation Disorders and Syndrome Position Paper from ASCIA

In April 2024, the Australasian Society of Clinical Immunology and Allergy (ASCIA) published a detailed position paper titled Diagnosis and Investigation of Mast Cell Activation Disorders and Syndrome.

The paper addresses key topics such as definitions of Mast Cell Activation Disorders (MCAD) subtypes, diagnostic criteria, and available testing in Australia. TAMS considers the paper to be a useful resource, particularly for individuals consulting with a general practitioner (GP) about a potential MCAD diagnosis for themselves or their child.


Skin testing

First and foremost, a careful examination of the skin should be undertaken, looking for characteristic lesions of mastocytosis. If lesions are found, the physician should stroke the lesion firmly with a tongue depressor 5 or 6 times to see if it urticates (Darier’s sign). However, flushing and systemic low blood pressure can result from attempts to identify Darier’s sign in young children who have cutaneous mastocytoma or a polymorphic variant of maculopapular cutaneous mastocytosis with nodular lesions, such that this test should be avoided in these patients.1, 2 Darier’s sign is positive in almost all children and most of the adults who have skin involvement in mastocytosis. An international consensus task force of mast cell disease specialists has recently proposed that Darier’s sign be included as part of the major criterion for diagnosing skin involvement in mastocytosis patients.2 Clear areas of skin can be stroked in the same way noted above to check for dermatographism, or skin writing, in which the area stroked becomes inflamed. Darier’s sign and  dermatographism are characteristic cutaneous symptoms in mast cell diseases.


Tests for Mast Cell Activation and Mast Cell Activation Syndrome (MCAS)

An increase in the serum level of tryptase, above baseline and within a narrow (generally accepted as one to two hour) window of time after a symptomatic episode, is proposed as the preferred method for providing evidence of mast cell involvement.3-5 An international consensus article provides a method for calculating the required minimum rise in serum tryptase:5

After a reaction, a level of serum tryptase that is a minimum of 20% above the basal serum tryptase level, plus 2 ng/ml, will meet the second criterion for a mast cell activation event. For example, if a patient had a basal (baseline level, at least 24 hours after a reaction) serum tryptase level of 8 ng/ml, a 20% rise, plus 2 ng/ml, would be 11.6 ng/ml. To meet the above criterion for serum tryptase, the patient would need a post-reaction serum tryptase level above 11.6 ng/ml. The calculation would be conducted as follows:

(8 ng/ml x 1.2) + 2 ng/ml = 11.6 ng/ml

(basal level, plus 20%) + additional 2 ng/ml = the serum tryptase level, after a reaction, that must be exceeded in order to meet a rise in serum tryptase considered a mast cell activation event

Consensus members also agreed that when serum tryptase evaluation is not available or when the tryptase level does not rise sufficiently to meet the required increase for the co-criterion, other mediator tests could suffice. A rise in urinary n-methyl histamine is considered an alternative for the co-criterion related to a requirement for a mast cell mediator level rise during a systemic mast cell activation event.5, 6 Some practitioners currently utilize other tests to make a diagnosis of mast cell activation. While we strongly recognize that we are limited in that there are many mast cell mediators, The Australasian Mastocytosis Society (TAMS) cannot endorse the use of other mediator markers as diagnostic tools until they have been adequately evaluated and proven as valid for mast cell diseases in sound, scientific research. TAMS strongly supports and currently funds research to identify better markers for mast cell activation.

TAMS does recognize, however, that capturing a mediator rise is not always easy, and depends on many factors, internal and environmental. We have seen 24-hour urine samples test negative simply because the lab technician did not refrigerate the sample in a timely manner (when the test was repeated and handled properly, the result was positive). Therefore, we support the use of a clinical diagnosis and advise that the patient continues to be treated when the following criteria have been met:7

  • An exhaustive work-up has ruled out other medical conditions with similar symptoms and presentations
  • The patient has exhibited consistent symptoms of mast cell activation in 2 or more organ systems during the same period of time, such as skin, gastrointestinal tract, central nervous system, etc.
  • The patient responds to antimediator therapy
  • The patient is monitored on a regular basis, with testing for mediator rises performed periodically, by a mast cell or other specialist and/or in conjunction with an established local allergist or other physician
  • The patient is evaluated for other disease processes on an ongoing basis in order to be inclusive of any new changes in the patient’s condition

Routine and Follow-up Testing for MCAS

In patients who demonstrate a mediator rise, mediator testing should be repeated periodically. In addition, a complete blood count (CBC) with differential, blood chemistries, immunoglobulin levels, liver function tests, DXA scans for bone density, and other testing may all be done as part of the routine exam, depending on the patient’s age, presenting symptoms, coexisting conditions and medication profile.8 

Tests for Clonal Mast Cell Diseases Such as Systemic Mastocytosis or Monoclonal MCAS

Bone Marrow Biopsy

Standard technique can be used to obtain an iliac crest bone marrow biopsy and aspirate smear for diagnosis. Aspirated bone marrow should be allocated for flow cytometry to assess for the presence of mast cells with aberrant phenotype. KIT mutation testing (see below) can also be performed on bone marrow aspirate. Immunohistochemistry for KIT, mast cell tryptase, and CD25 should be performed on sections of the biopsy.1, 9-12, 20

KIT Mutation Testing13

To understand why KIT testing is necessary, one must first understand the difference between clonal and non-clonal mast cell diseases. Clonal means that there is a defect in a person’s mast cell DNA, which results in their mast cells having abnormal characteristics. Although the most common defect seen in mast cell disease is KIT D816V, it is not the only one that can result in an abnormal disease process. Numerous other mutations in KIT have been associated with mastocytosis, and in the absence of a KIT D816V mutation, other testing can be performed to identify them, including KIT sequencing. If you have no change (no mutation, such as a KIT mutation) identified in your mast cell DNA, but experience mast cell activation, then you may have non-clonal disease, such as idiopathic mast cell activation syndrome.

There has been a peptide nucleic acid mediated PCR based test available for years that can identify the KIT D816V mutation in peripheral blood, and it has been able to detect the mutation in 44% of systemic mastocytosis patients tested.14 A newer test, an allele-specific oligonucleotide qPCR test, has proven to be much more sensitive and reliable. Patients with indolent systemic mastocytosis with skin involvement, for example, were found to have the KIT D816V mutation 92% of the time using the newer allele-specific qPCR blood test.14

Although the more sensitive test for the KIT D816V mutation (the allele-specific qPCR, with a sensitivity of 0.01%) that can be performed in peripheral blood samples has been developed, is not yet available here in Australia. However, in the US, Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN can perform the allele-specific oligonucleotide PCR (ASO-PCR) test for KIT D816V and the test may be available through several other labs in the US. Currently in the US, the result is often reported as either positive or negative, although in a research setting, results can be presented in more detail as an “allelic frequency”, which is essentially a measure of the extent to which the mutation is present versus KIT without that mutation (the allelic frequency can help in determining disease prognosis). It is important to note that receiving a negative test does not rule out a mast cell disease.13, 15 If an adult with systemic mastocytosis does not test positive for the KIT D816V mutation using sensitive testing methods, then sequencing of KIT might be considered.

Knowing the KIT mutation status can be very important when considering therapeutic options such as new medications and chemotherapy. The development of the allele-specific qPCR test has made peripheral blood KIT testing more widely available with a number of labs in Australia now accepting requests for testing. More information on the use of KIT mutation testing in mast cell diseases (including potential use in prognosis and is available in published recommendations from the European Competence Network on Mastocytosis (ECNM).

Routine and Follow-up Testing for Systemic Mastocytosis (SM) and Smoldering SM

Examinations should occur periodically and include:13

  • Dermatological exam (with stroking for Darier’s sign)
  • Careful palpation of the liver, spleen and lymph nodes
  • A full neuropsychological evaluation
  • CBC with differential
  • Serum tryptase and 24-hour urines for N-methyl histamine
  • Liver function tests, serum albumin, serum LDH, and serum alkaline phosphatase16
  • Blood chemistries
  • Total immunoglobulins or total IgE, if indicated by previous testing
  • DXA scans for bone density; nuclear medicine bone scan, if indicated
  • Bone marrow biopsy with flow cytometry and cytology, when indicated
  • Allele-specific qPCR for KIT D816V mutation in peripheral blood/bone marrow, if not already performed; KIT sequencing, if indicated13
  • CT scan/ultrasound, if indicated
  • Other tests may be performed, as indicated, if there is a suspected hematologic disorder or to evaluate the individual patient’s symptoms.

NOTE: More information on the use of the above tests and examinations can be found in Table 3 of the ECNM recommendations.13 TAMS has removed serum β2-microglobulin from the above list as this test is not routinely ordered to evaluate mastocytosis in Australia.

Diagnostic Workup for Advanced Systemic Mastocytosis Variants or Associated Hematological Diseases1, 13, 17, 18

When advanced disease or an associated hematological disorder is suspected, further evaluation of the patient beyond a bone marrow biopsy and aspirate with flow cytometry may include:

  • Comprehensive bloodwork
  • X-ray or CT scan of the chest, looking for evidence of significantly enlarged lymph nodes (greater than 2 cm in diameter)
  • X-ray, nuclear medicine bone scan of the skeletal system, or bone density scan looking for osteoporosis, osteosclerosis, or areas where calcium has been completely lost from bone
  • CT scan or ultrasound of the abdomen, looking for enlarged liver or spleen,16 enlarged lymph nodes, or the collection of fluid
  • Endoscopy/colonoscopy and biopsy of the gastrointestinal tract, looking for evidence of mast cell infiltration, ulcers, or areas of bleeding. Mast cell infiltration can be identified by aggregates of 15 or more abnormal mast cells, or sheets of mast cells. Abnormal mast cells can be identified by the presence of CD25 on these cells.19
  • Other tests may include next-generation sequencing and myeloid gene panels for additional genetic lesions.



  1. Valent P, Akin C, Escribano L, Fodinger M, Hartmann K, Brockow K, et al. Standards and standardization in mastocytosis: consensus statements on diagnostics, treatment recommendations and response criteria. Eur J Clin Invest. 2007 Jun;37(6):435-53. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17537151
  2. Hartmann K, Escribano L, Grattan C, Brockow K, Carter MC, Alvarez-Twose I, et al. Cutaneous manifestations in patients with mastocytosis: Consensus report of the European Competence Network on Mastocytosis; the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology; and the European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016 Jan;137(1):35-45. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26476479
  3. Schwartz LB, Sakai K, Bradford TR, Ren S, Zweiman B, Worobec AS, et al. The alpha form of human tryptase is the predominant type present in blood at baseline in normal subjects and is elevated in those with systemic mastocytosis. J Clin Invest. 1995 Dec;96(6):2702-10. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8675637
  4. Schwartz LB, Irani AM. Serum tryptase and the laboratory diagnosis of systemic mastocytosis. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2000 Jun;14(3):641-57. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10909044
  5. Valent P, Akin C, Arock M, Brockow K, Butterfield JH, Carter MC, et al. Definitions, criteria and global classification of mast cell disorders with special reference to mast cell activation syndromes: a consensus proposal. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2012;157(3):215-25. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22041891
  6. Hamilton MJ, Hornick JL, Akin C, Castells MC, Greenberger NJ. Mast cell activation syndrome: a newly recognized disorder with systemic clinical manifestations. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011 Jul;128(1):147-52 e2. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21621255
  7. Cardet JC, Castells MC, Hamilton MJ. Immunology and clinical manifestations of non-clonal mast cell activation syndrome. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2013 Feb;13(1):10-8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23212667
  8. Picard M, Giavina-Bianchi P, Mezzano V, Castells M. Expanding spectrum of mast cell activation disorders: monoclonal and idiopathic mast cell activation syndromes. Clin Ther. 2013 May;35(5):548-62. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23642289
  9. Alvarez-Twose I, Morgado JM, Sanchez-Munoz L, Garcia-Montero A, Mollejo M, Orfao A, et al. Current state of biology and diagnosis of clonal mast cell diseases in adults. Int J Lab Hematol. 2012 Oct;34(5):445-60. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22551157
  10. Horny HP, Sotlar K, Valent P. Mastocytosis: state of the art. Pathobiology. 2007;74(2):121-32. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17587883
  11. Horny HP, Valent P. Diagnosis of mastocytosis: general histopathological aspects, morphological criteria, and immunohistochemical findings. Leuk Res. 2001 Jul;25(7):543-51. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11377679
  12. Escribano L, Garcia Montero AC, Nunez R, Orfao A. Flow cytometric analysis of normal and neoplastic mast cells: role in diagnosis and follow-up of mast cell disease. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2006 Aug;26(3):535-47. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16931292
  13. Arock M, Sotlar K, Akin C, Broesby-Olsen S, Hoermann G, Escribano L, et al. KIT mutation analysis in mast cell neoplasms: recommendations of the European Competence Network on Mastocytosis. Leukemia. 2015 Jun;29(6):1223-32. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25650093
  14. Jara-Acevedo M, Teodosio C, Sanchez-Munoz L, Alvarez-Twose I, Mayado A, Caldas C, et al. Detection of the KIT D816V mutation in peripheral blood of systemic mastocytosis: diagnostic implications. Mod Pathol. 2015 Aug;28(8):1138-49. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26067933
  15. Kristensen T, Vestergaard H, Bindslev-Jensen C, Moller MB, Broesby-Olsen S, Mastocytosis Centre OUH. Sensitive KIT D816V mutation analysis of blood as a diagnostic test in mastocytosis. Am J Hematol. 2014 May;89(5):493-8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24443360
  16. Jawhar M, Schwaab J, Hausmann D, Clemens J, Naumann N, Henzler T, et al. Splenomegaly, elevated alkaline phosphatase and mutations in the SRSF2/ASXL1/RUNX1 gene panel are strong adverse prognostic markers in patients with systemic mastocytosis. Leukemia. 2016 Dec;30(12):2342-50. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27416984
  17. Gotlib J, Pardanani A, Akin C, Reiter A, George T, Hermine O, et al. International Working Group-Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment (IWG-MRT) & European Competence Network on Mastocytosis (ECNM) consensus response criteria in advanced systemic mastocytosis. Blood. 2013 Mar 28;121(13):2393-401. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23325841
  18. Lim KH, Tefferi A, Lasho TL, Finke C, Patnaik M, Butterfield JH, et al. Systemic mastocytosis in 342 consecutive adults: survival studies and prognostic factors. Blood. 2009 Jun 4;113(23):5727-36. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19363219
  19. Hahn HP, Hornick JL. Immunoreactivity for CD25 in gastrointestinal mucosal mast cells is specific for systemic mastocytosis. Am J Surg Pathol. 2007 Nov;31(11):1669-76. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18059223
  20. El Hussein S, Chifotides HT, Khoury JD, Verstovsek S, Thakral B. Systemic Mastocytosis and Other Entities Involving Mast Cells: A Practical Review and Update. (Table 2). Cancers (Basel). July 2022;14(14):3474. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8659997/table/T2/?report=objectonly


TAMS wish to acknowledge the American Society of Clinical Oncology and Cancer.Net as the original authors of the above information. View original source on Cancer.Net.

Share This